FACULTY OF FINE ARTS AND DESIGN
Department of Industrial Design| Course Name |
Drawing and Representation
|
|
Code
|
Semester
|
Theory
(hour/week) |
Application/Lab
(hour/week) |
Local Credits
|
ECTS
|
|
FFD 111
|
Fall
|
0
|
4
|
2
|
4
|
| Prerequisites |
None
|
|||||
| Course Language |
English
|
|||||
| Course Type |
Required
|
|||||
| Course Level |
First Cycle
|
|||||
| Mode of Delivery | - | |||||
| Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course | DiscussionProblem SolvingCritical feedbackField trip / ObservationLecture / PresentationField work/Application | |||||
| National Occupation Classification | - | |||||
| Course Coordinator | ||||||
| Course Lecturer(s) |
|
|||||
| Assistant(s) | - | |||||
| Course Objectives | This course introduces basic drawing techniques and is designed to increase the students' observation skills and develop basic drawing skills. Emphasis is placed on the fundamentals of both perceptual and conceptual drawings using freehand technical drawing as a method |
| Learning Outcomes |
The students who succeeded in this course;
|
| Course Description | The course introduces freehand drawing both in real or imaginary situations with rendering techniques that are used to accurately communicate the way objects and spaces look in three dimensional projections. Conceptual and presentational drawings and rendering in mixed media will be covered |
| Related Sustainable Development Goals |
|
|
|
Core Courses |
X
|
| Major Area Courses | ||
| Supportive Courses | ||
| Media and Management Skills Courses | ||
| Transferable Skill Courses |
| Week | Subjects | Related Preparation |
| 1 | Introduction, Gesture and Contour Drawing (Exercise 1) | Presentation and In-class Exercise |
| 2 | Solid-Void Contour Drawing Surface Drawing, Shading And Texture (Exercise 2) | Presentation and In-class Exercise |
| 3 | Materials - Shading And Texture (Exercise 3) | In-class Exercise |
| 4 | QUIZ I: Free hand drawing | |
| 5 | Orthographic Projection 1 (Exercise 4) | Presentation and In-class Exercise |
| 6 | Plan Oblique Derived From Sections (Exercise 5) | In-class Exercise |
| 7 | Orthographic Projection 2 (Exercise 6) | In-class Exercise |
| 8 | MIDTERM EXAM WEEK - No classes | - |
| 9 | Paraline Drawing; Isometric Proj. (30/30) 1 (Exercise 7) | Presentation and In-class Exercise |
| 10 | Paraline Drawing; Isometric Proj. (30/30) 2 (Exercise 8) | In-class Exercise |
| 11 | QUIZ II: Paraline Drawing | - |
| 12 | Linear Perspective 1 (Exercise 9) | Presentation and In-class Exercise |
| 13 | Linear Perspective 2- One-point (Exercise 10) | In-class Exercise |
| 14 | Linear Perspective 3 - Two-point (Exercise 11) | In-class Exercise |
| 15 | Final Exam | |
| 16 | Semester Review |
| Course Notes/Textbooks | Ching, F. D. K. Architectural Graphics. John Wiley & Sons: NY, 2003. ISBN-13: 978-0470399118, ISBN-10: 9780470399118 |
| Suggested Readings/Materials |
|
| Semester Activities | Number | Weigthing |
| Participation | ||
| Laboratory / Application | ||
| Field Work | ||
| Quizzes / Studio Critiques |
2
|
40
|
| Portfolio | ||
| Homework / Assignments |
1
|
30
|
| Presentation / Jury | ||
| Project | ||
| Seminar / Workshop | ||
| Oral Exams | ||
| Midterm | ||
| Final Exam |
1
|
30
|
| Total |
| Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
3
|
70
|
| Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
1
|
30
|
| Total |
| Semester Activities | Number | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
|---|---|---|---|
| Theoretical Course Hours (Including exam week: 16 x total hours) |
16
|
0
|
|
| Laboratory / Application Hours (Including exam week: '.16.' x total hours) |
16
|
4
|
64
|
| Study Hours Out of Class |
0
|
||
| Field Work |
0
|
||
| Quizzes / Studio Critiques |
2
|
4
|
8
|
| Portfolio |
0
|
||
| Homework / Assignments |
1
|
24
|
24
|
| Presentation / Jury |
0
|
||
| Project |
0
|
||
| Seminar / Workshop |
0
|
||
| Oral Exam |
0
|
||
| Midterms |
0
|
||
| Final Exam |
1
|
4
|
4
|
| Total |
100
|
|
#
|
Program Competencies/Outcomes |
* Contribution Level
|
||||||
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
||||
| 1 |
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
| 2 |
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
| 3 |
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
| 4 |
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
||
| 5 |
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
| 6 |
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
| 7 |
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
| 8 |
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
| 9 |
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
| 10 |
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
| 11 |
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
| 12 |
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
| 13 |
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest
As Izmir University of Economics transforms into a world-class university, it also raises successful young people with global competence.
More..Izmir University of Economics produces qualified knowledge and competent technologies.
More..Izmir University of Economics sees producing social benefit as its reason for existence.
More..