FACULTY OF FINE ARTS AND DESIGN
Department of Industrial Design| Course Name |
Product Design Studio II
|
|
Code
|
Semester
|
Theory
(hour/week) |
Application/Lab
(hour/week) |
Local Credits
|
ECTS
|
|
ID 202
|
Spring
|
2
|
6
|
5
|
10
|
| Prerequisites |
None
|
|||||
| Course Language |
English
|
|||||
| Course Type |
Required
|
|||||
| Course Level |
First Cycle
|
|||||
| Mode of Delivery | - | |||||
| Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course | - | |||||
| National Occupation Classification | - | |||||
| Course Coordinator | ||||||
| Course Lecturer(s) | ||||||
| Assistant(s) | - | |||||
| Course Objectives | This course aims to enhance students' knowledge and understanding of the principle methods and tools of the industrial design process through the exploration of design problems. One or more design projects will be done where students will undertake design processes to consider the context of a product, and resolve its utility, its usability, its visual appearance, and its manufacturing, aspects. |
| Learning Outcomes |
The students who succeeded in this course;
|
| Course Description | This course will consist of one or more intermediate level industrial design projects. Students will undertake design processes, to a moderate degree of technical detail, that focus on specific aspects of the design problem for consumer products. Students will produce convincing models and visual presentations of their design concepts. |
| Related Sustainable Development Goals |
|
|
|
Core Courses |
X
|
| Major Area Courses | ||
| Supportive Courses | ||
| Media and Management Skills Courses | ||
| Transferable Skill Courses |
| Week | Subjects | Related Preparation |
| 1 | Introduction to Project 1, project brief, discussion. | None --- Related work for P1 |
| 2 | P1 - Design enhancement applications, feedback discussion session. | Related work for P1 |
| 3 | P1 - Design enhancement applications, feedback discussion session. | Related work for P1 |
| 4 | P1 - Concept development and feedback session | Related work for P1 |
| 5 | P1 - Concept development and feedback session | Related work for P2 |
| 6 | P1 - Concept development and feedback session | Related work for P1 |
| 7 | P1 - Presentations | Submission Materials |
| 8 | Midterm Week | |
| 9 | Introduction to Project 2 | Related work for P2 |
| 10 | P2 - Design development. Individual Feedback Session | P2 - Models and Design drawings |
| 11 | P2 - Models and Technical drawings feedback session and discussion. | P2 - Models andTechnical drawings |
| 12 | P2- Feedback session and discussion | Related work for P2 |
| 13 | P2 - General technical issues discussion; Preliminary Final Model and 2D Presentation feedback session and discussion. | P2 - Preliminary Final Model and Preliminary Final 2D Presentation |
| 14 | P2 - Enhanced Final Model and Final 2D Presentation feedback session and discussion. | P2 - Enhanced Final Model and Final 2D Presentation |
| 15 | P2 - Final Submission | P2 - Final Submission requirements. |
| 16 | - | - |
| Course Notes/Textbooks | Tutorials will be provided according to project subject |
| Suggested Readings/Materials | Cross, Nigel. 2000. Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design. John Wiley & Sons. Jones, J. Christopher. 1992. Design Methods. Second Edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Lumsdaine, Edward and Monika Lumsdaine. 1995. Creative Problem Solving; Thinking Skills for a Changing World. New York: McGrawHill. Margulies, Nancy and Nusa Maal. 2002. Mapping Inner Space, Second Edition. Chicago: Zephyr Press. Nagashima, Noriyuki and Kunio Sano. 1994. Industrial Design Workshop 2: The Creative Process Behind Product Design. Tokyo: Meisei Publications. Powell, Dick. 1990. Presentation Techniques: A Guide to Drawing and Presenting Design Ideas. Little, Brown. Schön, Donald. 1991. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. London: Ashgate Publishing Limited. Shimizu, Yoshiharu and Takashi Kojima, Masazo Tano, Shinji Matsuda. 2000. Models & Prototypes. GraphicSha. |
| Semester Activities | Number | Weigthing |
| Participation | ||
| Laboratory / Application | ||
| Field Work | ||
| Quizzes / Studio Critiques |
1
|
20
|
| Portfolio | ||
| Homework / Assignments | ||
| Presentation / Jury |
2
|
40
|
| Project |
1
|
40
|
| Seminar / Workshop | ||
| Oral Exams | ||
| Midterm |
-
|
-
|
| Final Exam |
-
|
-
|
| Total |
| Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
4
|
100
|
| Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
-
|
|
| Total |
| Semester Activities | Number | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
|---|---|---|---|
| Theoretical Course Hours (Including exam week: 16 x total hours) |
16
|
2
|
32
|
| Laboratory / Application Hours (Including exam week: '.16.' x total hours) |
16
|
6
|
96
|
| Study Hours Out of Class |
15
|
2
|
30
|
| Field Work |
0
|
||
| Quizzes / Studio Critiques |
1
|
16
|
16
|
| Portfolio |
0
|
||
| Homework / Assignments |
0
|
||
| Presentation / Jury |
2
|
18
|
36
|
| Project |
2
|
45
|
90
|
| Seminar / Workshop |
0
|
||
| Oral Exam |
0
|
||
| Midterms |
-
|
-
|
0
|
| Final Exam |
-
|
-
|
0
|
| Total |
300
|
|
#
|
Program Competencies/Outcomes |
* Contribution Level
|
||||||
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
||||
| 1 |
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
| 2 |
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
||
| 3 |
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
| 4 |
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
| 5 |
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
| 6 |
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
||
| 7 |
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
||
| 8 |
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
||
| 9 |
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
| 10 |
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
| 11 |
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
| 12 |
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
| 13 |
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest
As Izmir University of Economics transforms into a world-class university, it also raises successful young people with global competence.
More..Izmir University of Economics produces qualified knowledge and competent technologies.
More..Izmir University of Economics sees producing social benefit as its reason for existence.
More..