FACULTY OF FINE ARTS AND DESIGN
Department of Industrial Design| Course Name |
Contemporary Issues in Industrial Design
|
|
Code
|
Semester
|
Theory
(hour/week) |
Application/Lab
(hour/week) |
Local Credits
|
ECTS
|
|
ID 302
|
Fall/Spring
|
3
|
0
|
3
|
4
|
| Prerequisites |
None
|
|||||
| Course Language |
English
|
|||||
| Course Type |
Elective
|
|||||
| Course Level |
First Cycle
|
|||||
| Mode of Delivery | Online | |||||
| Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course | Guest SpeakerLecture / Presentation | |||||
| National Occupation Classification | - | |||||
| Course Coordinator | ||||||
| Course Lecturer(s) | ||||||
| Assistant(s) | - | |||||
| Course Objectives | This course aims to analyze and implement the contemporary subjects and up-to-date issues regarding the industrial design discipline and practice. Bringing important subjects in industrial design area for last two decades, this course provides students a concise vision and perspective about the design practices and discipline. |
| Learning Outcomes |
The students who succeeded in this course;
|
| Course Description | This course aims to analyze the contemporary approaches developed for the design process and concept scrutinizing the relation between the designer and the user. |
| Related Sustainable Development Goals |
|
|
|
Core Courses | |
| Major Area Courses | ||
| Supportive Courses |
X
|
|
| Media and Management Skills Courses | ||
| Transferable Skill Courses |
| Week | Subjects | Related Preparation |
| 1 | Introduction of the course. | None |
| 2 | Use-Users-Designers, Design by Use | Brandes, U. (2009). Design by use: The everyday metamorphosis of things. Berlin, Germany: Birkhauser. |
| 3 | Non-intentional Design | Brandes, U., & Erlhoff, M. (2006). Non intentional design. Köln, Germany: Daab |
| 4 | Participatory Design | Kristensson, P., Magnusson, P. R., & Matthing, J. (2002). Users as a hidden resource for creativity: Findings from an experimental study on user involvement. Creativity and Innovation Management, 11(1), p. 55–61. |
| 5 | Design probes. | Mattelmaki, T. (2005). Applying probes – From inspirational notes to collaborative insights. CoDesign, 1(2), p. 83–102. |
| 6 | Design Thinking | Cooper, R., Junginger, S., & Lockwood, T. (2010). Design thinking and design management: A research and practice perspective. In T. Lockwood (Ed.), Design thinking: Integrating innovation, customer experience and brand value, p. 57–64. Allworth Press. |
| 7 | Design Etnography and Anthropology | Clarke, A. J. (2011). Introduction. In A. J. Clarke (Ed.), Design anthropology: Object culture in the 21st century, p. 9–13. New York, NY: Springer. |
| 8 | Midterm Week | None |
| 9 | User Scenarios | None |
| 10 | A Guest Speaker: ‘Working Rituals’A Guest Speaker: ‘Working Rituals’ | None |
| 11 | Developing a Project Idea | Sketches, charts, drawings |
| 12 | Project Development | Sketches, charts, drawings |
| 13 | Project Development | Sketches, charts, drawings |
| 14 | Project Development | Sketches, charts, drawings |
| 15 | Semester Review | None |
| 16 | Final Project Examination | None |
| Course Notes/Textbooks | |
| Suggested Readings/Materials | Lockwood, T. (2010). Design thinking: Integrating innovation, customer experience, and brand value. New York, NY: Allworth Press.
Mattelmaki, T. (2005). Applying probes – From inspirational notes to collaborative insights. CoDesign, 1(2), p. 83–102.
Suri, J.F. (2005).Thoughtless acts? Observations on intuitive design. SanFrancisco, CA: Chronicle Books.
Sanders, E. B. -N., & Stappers, P. J. (2012). Convivial toolbox: Generative research for the front end of design. Amsterdam: BIS. |
| Semester Activities | Number | Weigthing |
| Participation |
1
|
10
|
| Laboratory / Application | ||
| Field Work | ||
| Quizzes / Studio Critiques | ||
| Portfolio | ||
| Homework / Assignments | ||
| Presentation / Jury |
1
|
20
|
| Project | ||
| Seminar / Workshop | ||
| Oral Exams | ||
| Midterm |
1
|
30
|
| Final Exam |
1
|
40
|
| Total |
| Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
60
|
|
| Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade |
40
|
|
| Total |
| Semester Activities | Number | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
|---|---|---|---|
| Theoretical Course Hours (Including exam week: 16 x total hours) |
16
|
4
|
64
|
| Laboratory / Application Hours (Including exam week: '.16.' x total hours) |
16
|
0
|
|
| Study Hours Out of Class |
10
|
1
|
10
|
| Field Work |
0
|
||
| Quizzes / Studio Critiques |
0
|
||
| Portfolio |
0
|
||
| Homework / Assignments |
0
|
||
| Presentation / Jury |
1
|
4
|
4
|
| Project |
0
|
||
| Seminar / Workshop |
0
|
||
| Oral Exam |
0
|
||
| Midterms |
1
|
16
|
16
|
| Final Exam |
1
|
20
|
20
|
| Total |
114
|
|
#
|
Program Competencies/Outcomes |
* Contribution Level
|
||||||
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
||||
| 1 |
|
-
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
||
| 2 |
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
| 3 |
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
| 4 |
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
| 5 |
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
| 6 |
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
| 7 |
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
| 8 |
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
| 9 |
|
-
|
X
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
| 10 |
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
| 11 |
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
| 12 |
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
| 13 |
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest
As Izmir University of Economics transforms into a world-class university, it also raises successful young people with global competence.
More..Izmir University of Economics produces qualified knowledge and competent technologies.
More..Izmir University of Economics sees producing social benefit as its reason for existence.
More..